Brands adopt rival callouts as an emerging marketing tactic

The news: 2026 is already seeing a trend of combative marketing, with high-profile brands leaning into negative depictions of competitors—even if they don’t name names—to capture attention and drive social engagement.

  • After McDonald’s released a viral video of its CEO eating a burger that drew mockery, rival restaurants Wendy’s and Burger King swiftly released videos of their CEOs poking fun and promoting their own food.
  • Ahead of the Super Bowl, Anthropic aired an ad emphasizing Claude’s ad-free structure—a pointed contrast to OpenAI, albeit without name-dropping—and mocked the idea of chatbots inserting sponsored responses into user conversations.
  • BMW and Audi have a long-running, out-of-home sparring match, with dueling billboards where each brand responds to the other’s creative—a classic visual example of brands using physical media as a public battlefield.

Zooming out: In a fragmented attention economy, jabs at competitors can be cheaper—and more likely to catch on—than large-scale brand campaigns and social posts.

  • Punching up used to be the hallmark of scrappy brands. Now, companies do it to come across as culturally relevant and to raise brand awareness.
  • A single pointed video or ad, if culturally timed, can generate substantial earned reach and virality.

There’s also a structural shift underway: Leaders are now frontline content talent. As executive visibility rises across LinkedIn, X, and short-form video, CEOs aren’t insulated from the meme cycle and can become fodder for competitors and users alike.

The caveat: One risk is that engineered conflict prioritizes short-term engagement over long-term brand equity, or could create a negative brand perception. Shade can spark conversation while also elevating the competitor it aims to diminish.

Striking this tone requires extreme scrutiny: Support for brands seen as wronged could reflect poorly on companies that take jabs, and making directly aggressive shots against a competitor may not be as effective.

Implications for brands: Combative marketing straddles a delicate line between wit and mean-spiritedness, and if the message isn’t received clearly by the public, it could be difficult and expensive to walk back.

This content is part of EMARKETER’s subscription Briefings, where we pair daily updates with data and analysis from forecasts and research reports. Our Briefings prepare you to start your day informed, to provide critical insights in an important meeting, and to understand the context of what’s happening in your industry. Non-clients can click here to get a demo of our full platform and coverage.

You've read 0 of 2 free articles this month.

Get more articles - create your free account today!